The recent conflict that Batinder has brought up with her
new book makes for interesting discussions. The idea she promotes that homemaking
is anti-feminist in nature because it takes away from a woman’s personal
freedom bothers me on a few fronts. Although she brings up many valid points on
the dedication required in order to parent in an emotionally intelligent
manner, supporting children’s physical and psychological development under what
is often referred to as ‘attachment parenting’, I feel that she misses the boat
on the perceived ‘drawbacks’ of such a choice. I also feel that she herself has
shown some anti-feminist opinions that limit a woman’s abilities and value. You
don’t need to be a hardcore feminist to realise that women are consistently
devalued in society and now that women themselves are doing so to each other
baffles me completely.
The movement now towards full-time parenting, with women
often stalling their education or careers temporarily to be with their children
seems like a backlash against the now typical unfolding of family life where
children are separated from parents early. The movement of ‘attachment
parenting’ is not a modern concept, more like it is a return to intuitive parenting
that has been previously overwhelmed by coercive parenting practices that
sought to push children into dependence rather than let it unfold naturally
exactly so that women can enter the workforce sooner. Those parenting practices
supported what families wanted and valued at the time: independence from
childcare. But now, with the publication of long-term studies on the effect
this has on children’s psychological development, more and more parents are
choosing to change their perspective on parenting from being an inconvenience
to being a sacred calling. However, since this is not longer the norm, those
that choose this route seem to gather the scorn of those who instead choose to focus
on careers and wealth. It is often portrayed as an insult to all the work
previous women have invested in opening the doors to the workforce to women
specifically. Some even go as far as to take it personally that another women
chooses to make the sacrifices necessary to her lifestyle in order to stay at
home with her children, claiming that she is ‘holier than thou’ because of this,
rather than because she may feel it is honoring her maternal instincts.
However, one of the main goals of many feminist agendas is
fighting for the right for women to have the power to precisely CHOOSE the
lives they wish to lead and be supported in that. I get the impression however
from Badinter’s writing that choosing to consciously parent is inferior to
pursuing personal interests. I feel that this belittles the work that women do lovingly
maintaining their home environment and their family’s well-being as their full-time
occupation. Why motherhood as a vocation is not considered to be a valid choice
for women to make is beyond me. Regardless if women wish to do housework or
not, or raise their children or not, someone needs to do it. If women choose to
not do it themselves, they must pay someone else to do so for them. I know that
personally I am not comfortable with trusting flawed institutions to raise my
children in an empathic and developmentally appropriate manner. There is plenty
of literature on this subject, with the writings of David Elkind and Alfie Kohn
as excellent places to start for example. The daycare industry is also not as
beneficial as some need to believe, with issues developing in social and
emotional development because of a lack of continuity of care and caregiver to
child ratios. This system has many flaws, which I am well aware of because of
my experience in the field and attending college exactly for working in this
industry. It is another area that needs positive change and more government support
to be beneficial for those who choose to or need to use them, but I digress.
However, many women who need to return to work immediately
after birthing their babies express the desire to remain at home with their
children but financial issues prevent them from doing so, showing that the ability to parent one’s own children is important
for many women. Many women WANT to mother but feel pressured by society’s
modern expectations of women to not only WANT a career but to aggressively
pursue it, to the detriment of other aspects of their lives. How is this liberating to women? Women
in general now are expected to do everything: have an education and a full
career, and also become dedicated mothers. It is a lot of expectations for a
single person, especially all at once. Many women try to meet the image of
super-woman and cause much unbalance in their lives, generating anxiety
problems and much frustration. It isn’t to say that a woman cannot both be a
mother and have a career, but unless the workforce changes to accommodate
parents, having them both at the same time now requires sacrificing one’s needs
for the other. Children adapt to this because they have to, but why is this
necessary? Or even desired? I feel that Badinter does not address the reality
of impersonal childcare and its consequences appropriately and the main focus
seems to be on the mother’s wants at the expense of her family.
Much of the feminist literature for example emphasizes
adopting pseudo-masculine behaviours in order to be accepted and successful in
the workforce. This was necessary at the time for women to shed their
stereotypical roles in order to be respected and taken seriously as it was a
man’s world after all. But if you look closely today, not much has really
changed. Women’s strengths, aptitudes, and biological needs are still not
considered valuable enough to fully support. Simply looking to our maternity
care systems, our financial and social aid programs, and our education systems
you can see the disparity. Why, if feminism is not yet dead, should women shed
their biological and instinctual roles in order to be considered valuable and
liberated? Why does motherhood, and other roles that are distinctly feminine
need to be abandoned in order to be considered having lived a worthy life?
Feminism for me, it isn’t about demanding to do like men in
every aspect of society. Sure, women can do almost anything a man can, however
as women and mothers, we have a unique contribution to make that is different
from what a man can contribute (just as men and fathers have their own unique
contributions that are different from women’s). That unique contribution should
be valued and integrated into society without forcing women to reject their own
biology. It makes no sense for children to suffer so that women can feel
empowered in a society that devalues them at every turn. We need to realise that
our value does not rest upon what formal education we have or what accolades we
gather, nor does it rest on how our children ‘turn out’ either. We should feel
that whatever choices we made in our lives were done consciously and supportively
and to accept the unfolding of them.
Another consistent flaw to Batinder’s perspective towards
motherhood is that the needs of the child are being ignored or dismissed
completely. A mother’s interests outside of her relationship to her family are
being elevated so high that her responsibility to the well-being of her family
is being downplayed. She often puts the emphasis on a woman’s needs above that
of the children she is responsible for and this approach to the parent-child
relationship has its costs as well. When one’s person’s needs are put above the
other, in any relationship, this causes dysfunction. In this case the children
are the ones bearing the brunt of having to adapt to inappropriate expectations
for their development so that their parents can pursue their own ambitions. How
is this considered healthy? Especially since the most crucial time period for laying
the foundations for healthy development in a child’s life is the first 3-5
years of their life, very little time in the grand scheme of things, to
dedicate solely to meeting that child’s needs and prepare them for success in
the world.
I can understand how mothering full-time does not appeal to
everyone however. Women are still very much unsupported in child-rearing and it
can be lonely if a community is not sought out. We also bring into parenthood
all the issues we have from our own childhoods which are often brought back to
the surface after having a baby, causing much anxiety if we do not put any
effort into our own personal growth during this time. Parenting can be
incredibly difficult because of this and some women are just not ready or
interested in investing their time in this project. It is hard work being a
mother and I understand the desire to escape home and deal with more mundane
work-related issues that are more impersonal. I do not believe however that neglecting
the needs of the family are necessary in having a fulfilling life and feeling ‘accomplished’.
We definitely can have our cake and eat it too but some serious changes on a
societal level need to be implemented. In reality, women need to be supported
in integrating their family lives with work, if they are to be properly
enmeshed and not cause dysfunction. Parenting cannot be seen as an isolated
responsibility, a side-note to life. It should really be the main focus of our
care systems, to ensure that the next generations are raised in a healthy
manner and that parents are supported completely in meeting their family’s
needs and pursue their interests.
I strongly believe that consciously choosing to raise your
own children in a culture that no longer reveres motherhood is extremely
feminist, as it makes the bold statement that MOTHERS matter and that CHILDREN
matter. And that’s fabulous.


